試験312-50v13-JPN トピック1 問題381 スレッド
ECCouncil 312-50v13-JPNのリアル試験問題集
問題 #: 381
トピック #: 1
問題 #: 381
トピック #: 1
テキサス州オースティンのテクノロジー系スタートアップ企業で実施されている侵入テストにおいて、倫理的なハッカーがステルススキャン技術に対する防御策を評価するという課題に取り組んでいます。彼女は、フラグのないTCPパケットを送信し、標的システムの応答からポートの開閉を推測するという手法を選択しました。これにより、フルハンドシェイク方式に比べて侵入検知システムによる検出を回避できます。彼女はどのスキャン手法を使用しているのでしょうか?
おすすめの解答:C 解答を投票する
The method described-sending TCP packets with no flags set-is a NULL scan. In TCP header terminology, a NULL packet has all control flags cleared (no SYN, ACK, FIN, RST, PSH, URG). The scanner then interprets the target's response behavior to infer port state. Traditionally, for many TCP/IP stacks, a closed port responds with RST, while an open port may respond with no reply (silence) because the packet does not correspond to any valid state in the TCP state machine. This behavior can vary by OS and filtering devices, but the defining characteristic is the "no flags" probe.
The scenario also highlights stealth: compared to a TCP connect scan, which completes a full three-way handshake and is easily logged, NULL scans can be less conspicuous because they avoid a normal connection setup. Some intrusion detection systems focus heavily on repeated SYN handshakes or completed connections; unusual flag scans may slip through weak detection, though modern IDS/IPS can still detect them.
Why the other options are incorrect:
TCP Connect Scan (A) uses the operating system's connect() call to establish a full TCP connection; it is not a "no flags" technique and is generally noisier.
FIN Scan (B) sends packets with the FIN flag set; it is a different "stealth" scan type, but not "no flags." ACK Scan (D) sends packets with the ACK flag set and is typically used to map firewall rules (filtered vs unfiltered), not to determine open vs closed ports in the same way, and again it is not "no flags." Therefore, the scanning method is C. NULL Scan.
The scenario also highlights stealth: compared to a TCP connect scan, which completes a full three-way handshake and is easily logged, NULL scans can be less conspicuous because they avoid a normal connection setup. Some intrusion detection systems focus heavily on repeated SYN handshakes or completed connections; unusual flag scans may slip through weak detection, though modern IDS/IPS can still detect them.
Why the other options are incorrect:
TCP Connect Scan (A) uses the operating system's connect() call to establish a full TCP connection; it is not a "no flags" technique and is generally noisier.
FIN Scan (B) sends packets with the FIN flag set; it is a different "stealth" scan type, but not "no flags." ACK Scan (D) sends packets with the ACK flag set and is typically used to map firewall rules (filtered vs unfiltered), not to determine open vs closed ports in the same way, and again it is not "no flags." Therefore, the scanning method is C. NULL Scan.
杉浦** 2026-07-25 01:45:00
コメント
他人の解答コメントを賛成するのも、その解答に一票を入れることになります。したがって、すでに同じ意見の投票コメントが存在する場合、新規コメントをする代わりに賛成することもできます。
コメントを通報する
コメント中
今すぐ 新規登録 / ログイン (無料です)。