試験NSE4_FGT_AD-7.6-JPN トピック4 問題42 スレッド

From the current HA status, HQ-NGFW-1 is the primary and HQ-NGFW-2 is the secondary.
The administrator then changes these HA parameters:
HQ-NGFW-1: set override disable, set priority 90
HQ-NGFW-2: set override enable, set priority 110
In FGCP (A-P mode), the override (preemption) feature controls whether a higher-priority unit is allowed to take over the primary role.
When override is enabled, the cluster will prefer (and can re-elect) the unit with the highest device priority to become primary (preempting a lower-priority primary when conditions trigger re-election behavior as defined by FGCP).
Here, HQ-NGFW-2 has:
override enabled
higher priority (110) than HQ-NGFW-1 (90)
Therefore, the expected result is that HQ-NGFW-2 becomes the primary.
Why the other options are incorrect:
B is incorrect because it claims HQ-NGFW-2 has lower priority (it is higher: 110 > 90).
C is incorrect because a mismatch in the override setting is not what causes the "configuration out of sync" condition shown in get system ha status (that is about synchronized configuration databases, not a requirement that override values must match to remain in-sync).
D is incorrect because HA settings like override/priority are not synchronized in the way regular configuration objects are; they are device-level HA parameters.