試験C_TS422_2023-JPN トピック9 問題78 スレッド
SAP C_TS422_2023-JPNのリアル試験問題集
問題 #: 78
トピック #: 9
問題 #: 78
トピック #: 9
ディスパッチ後にワーク センターで複数の操作のスケジュール日が同じになる複数のコミットメントの理由は何でしょうか? 注: この質問には 2 つの正解があります。
おすすめの解答:A,B 解答を投票する
In SAP S/4HANA, dispatching operations (e.g., in CM21 or PP/DS Planning Board) assigns them to work centers. Multiple commitments on the same date indicate overlapping schedules, caused by:
* The Finite Scheduling indicator is NOT set in the strategy profile(A): In PP/DS (strategy profile,
/SAPAPO/CDPSC11) or capacity planning (OPU5), if finite scheduling isn't active (e.g., work center CR02, Capacity tab, "Relevant to Finite Scheduling" unchecked), the system schedules operations infinitely, ignoring capacity limits and allowing overlaps on the same date.
* The work center has several individual capacities(B): If the work center (CR02, Capacity tab) has multiple individual capacities (e.g., 3 machines, field: No. of Individual Capacities), operations can be scheduled in parallel on the same date, each assigned to a separate capacity, resulting in multiple commitments.
Alternative work centers fully occupied(C) might force scheduling onto one center but doesn't inherently cause overlaps-it's a capacity issue, not a scheduling logic flaw.Change Planning Direction indicator(D) (e.
g., Forward/Backward in strategy profile) affects sequence, not overlapping commitments. This is per SAP's scheduling behavior.
* The Finite Scheduling indicator is NOT set in the strategy profile(A): In PP/DS (strategy profile,
/SAPAPO/CDPSC11) or capacity planning (OPU5), if finite scheduling isn't active (e.g., work center CR02, Capacity tab, "Relevant to Finite Scheduling" unchecked), the system schedules operations infinitely, ignoring capacity limits and allowing overlaps on the same date.
* The work center has several individual capacities(B): If the work center (CR02, Capacity tab) has multiple individual capacities (e.g., 3 machines, field: No. of Individual Capacities), operations can be scheduled in parallel on the same date, each assigned to a separate capacity, resulting in multiple commitments.
Alternative work centers fully occupied(C) might force scheduling onto one center but doesn't inherently cause overlaps-it's a capacity issue, not a scheduling logic flaw.Change Planning Direction indicator(D) (e.
g., Forward/Backward in strategy profile) affects sequence, not overlapping commitments. This is per SAP's scheduling behavior.
Hasegawa 2025-07-03 04:26:59
コメント
他人の解答コメントを賛成するのも、その解答に一票を入れることになります。したがって、すでに同じ意見の投票コメントが存在する場合、新規コメントをする代わりに賛成することもできます。
コメントを通報する
コメント中
今すぐ 新規登録 / ログイン (無料です)。