FCNSP 無料問題集「Fortinet Certified Network Security Professional (FCNSP v4.2)」
A network administrator connects his PC to the INTERNAL interface on a FortiGate unit. The administrator attempts to make an HTTPS connection to the FortiGate unit on the VLAN1 interface at the IP address of 10.0.1.1, but gets no connectivity.
The following troubleshooting commands are executed from the DOS prompt on the PC and from
the CLI.
C:\>ping 10.0.1.1
Pinging 10.0.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 10.0.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.0.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.0.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.0.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=255
user1 # get system interface
== [ internal ]
namE. internal modE. static ip: 10.0.1.254 255.255.255.128 status: up
netbios-forwarD. disable typE. physical mtu-overridE. disable
== [ vlan1 ]
namE. vlan1 modE. static ip: 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.128 status: up netb
ios-forwarD. disable typE. vlan mtu-overridE. disable
user1 # diagnose debug flow trace start 100
user1 # diagnose debug ena
user1 # diagnose debug flow filter daddr 10.0.1.1 10.0.1.1
id=20085 trace_id=274 msg="vd-root received a packet(proto=6, 10.0.1.130:47927->10.0.1.1:443)
from internal."
id=20085 trace_id=274 msg="allocate a new session-00000b1b"
id=20085 trace_id=274 msg="find SNAT: IP-10.0.1.1, port-43798"
id=20085 trace_id=274 msg="iprope_in_check() check failed, drop"
Based on the output from these commands, which of the following explanations is a possible cause of the problem?
The following troubleshooting commands are executed from the DOS prompt on the PC and from
the CLI.
C:\>ping 10.0.1.1
Pinging 10.0.1.1 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 10.0.1.1: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.0.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.0.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=255
Reply from 10.0.1.1: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=255
user1 # get system interface
== [ internal ]
namE. internal modE. static ip: 10.0.1.254 255.255.255.128 status: up
netbios-forwarD. disable typE. physical mtu-overridE. disable
== [ vlan1 ]
namE. vlan1 modE. static ip: 10.0.1.1 255.255.255.128 status: up netb
ios-forwarD. disable typE. vlan mtu-overridE. disable
user1 # diagnose debug flow trace start 100
user1 # diagnose debug ena
user1 # diagnose debug flow filter daddr 10.0.1.1 10.0.1.1
id=20085 trace_id=274 msg="vd-root received a packet(proto=6, 10.0.1.130:47927->10.0.1.1:443)
from internal."
id=20085 trace_id=274 msg="allocate a new session-00000b1b"
id=20085 trace_id=274 msg="find SNAT: IP-10.0.1.1, port-43798"
id=20085 trace_id=274 msg="iprope_in_check() check failed, drop"
Based on the output from these commands, which of the following explanations is a possible cause of the problem?
正解:E
解答を投票する
The transfer of encrypted files or the use of encrypted protocols between users and servers on the internet can frustrate the efforts of administrators attempting to monitor traffic passing through the FortiGate unit and ensuring user compliance to corporate rules.
Which of the following items will allow the administrator to control the transfer of encrypted data through the FortiGate unit? (Select all that apply.)
Which of the following items will allow the administrator to control the transfer of encrypted data through the FortiGate unit? (Select all that apply.)
正解:A、C、D
解答を投票する
The FortiGate Server Authentication Extensions (FSAE) provide a single sign on solution to authenticate users transparently to a FortiGate unit using credentials stored in Windows Active Directory.
Which of the following statements are correct regarding FSAE in a Windows domain environment when NTLM is not used? (Select all that apply.)
Which of the following statements are correct regarding FSAE in a Windows domain environment when NTLM is not used? (Select all that apply.)
正解:A、E
解答を投票する
Examine the Exhibit shown below; then answer the question following it.

The Vancouver FortiGate unit initially had the following information in its routing table:
S 172.20.0.0/16 [10/0] via 172.21.1.2, port2 C 172.21.0.0/16 is directly connected, port2 C 172.11.11.0/24 is directly connected, port1
Afterwards, the following static route was added:
config router static edit 6 set dst 172.20.1.0 255.255.255.0 set pririoty 0 set device port1 set gateway 172.11.12.1
next end
Since this change, the new static route is NOT showing up in the routing table. Given the information provided, which of the following describes the cause of this problem?

The Vancouver FortiGate unit initially had the following information in its routing table:
S 172.20.0.0/16 [10/0] via 172.21.1.2, port2 C 172.21.0.0/16 is directly connected, port2 C 172.11.11.0/24 is directly connected, port1
Afterwards, the following static route was added:
config router static edit 6 set dst 172.20.1.0 255.255.255.0 set pririoty 0 set device port1 set gateway 172.11.12.1
next end
Since this change, the new static route is NOT showing up in the routing table. Given the information provided, which of the following describes the cause of this problem?
正解:D
解答を投票する