L6M1 無料問題集「CIPS Strategic Ethical Leadership」
SIMULATION
Fred has recently been promoted from a Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company. Having worked in the procurement department of Silly Name Company for over 15 years, he has many ideas of how to improve the department, some of them radical. How can Fred assess the readiness of the department to change? How would this impact his decisions to introduce his desired changes? (25 points)
Fred has recently been promoted from a Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company. Having worked in the procurement department of Silly Name Company for over 15 years, he has many ideas of how to improve the department, some of them radical. How can Fred assess the readiness of the department to change? How would this impact his decisions to introduce his desired changes? (25 points)
正解：
See the Answer is the explanation
Explanation:
Assessing Readiness for Change and Decision-Making: Fred's Approach as Head of Procurement Fred's recent promotion from Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company presents him with an opportunity to implement his ideas for departmental improvement. However, as someone who has worked in the same organization for 15 years, Fred must first assess the department's readiness for change before implementing radical reforms. Failure to do so could lead to resistance, disruption, and inefficiency. This essay explores how Fred can evaluate change readiness, and how this assessment will influence his decision-making.
Assessing the Readiness for Change
To successfully introduce changes in procurement, Fred must evaluate key factors that determine whether the department is ready to accept and implement new ideas.
1. Understanding the Organizational Culture
Fred should assess whether the company culture supports innovation and change or prefers stability and routine.
Indicators of Readiness: ✔ A culture that embraces innovation and continuous improvement.
✔ Employees who actively propose new ideas and improvements.
Potential Barriers: ✘ A culture resistant to change, where employees prefer "the way things have always been done."
✘ A history of failed change initiatives, causing skepticism.
Assessment Method:
✔ Surveys or feedback sessions to gauge employee attitudes toward change.
✔ Observing past change efforts-were they successful or met with resistance?
2. Evaluating Employee Buy-in and Mindset
Fred needs to assess whether employees are open to new ways of working or if they fear change due to job security concerns, workload increases, or lack of skills.
Indicators of Readiness: ✔ Employees express willingness to adopt new tools and processes.
✔ Staff members demonstrate adaptability to past procedural updates.
Potential Barriers: ✘ Employees fear that changes might make their jobs redundant.
✘ Resistance due to lack of understanding or training.
Assessment Method:
✔ Conduct one-on-one discussions or anonymous surveys on employee perceptions of change.
✔ Identify change champions who are enthusiastic about improvements.
3. Analyzing Current Processes and Pain Points
Before implementing radical changes, Fred must determine if current procurement processes are inefficient or if employees feel the need for change.
Indicators of Readiness: ✔ Procurement staff express frustration with outdated systems.
✔ Frequent delays, bottlenecks, or inefficiencies in procurement processes.
Potential Barriers: ✘ Employees feel the current processes work well enough and resist changing them.
✘ Lack of data to justify why new processes would be better than existing ones.
Assessment Method:
✔ Conduct a process audit to evaluate inefficiencies.
✔ Use KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) to measure procurement effectiveness.
4. Assessing Resource Availability
Even if the department is open to change, Fred must ensure there are sufficient resources (budget, technology, and expertise) to implement his ideas.
Indicators of Readiness: ✔ A budget exists to invest in new tools, training, or staff.
✔ The organization is willing to commit resources for change implementation.
Potential Barriers: ✘ Limited financial resources may delay or scale down initiatives.
✘ Employees lack the technical skills to adapt to new procurement methods.
Assessment Method:
✔ Check the procurement budget and forecast costs for proposed changes.
✔ Evaluate if the current team has the skills needed or requires training.
5. Leadership and Senior Management Support
Without support from senior management, Fred's efforts may not succeed. He must assess how committed leadership is to change.
Indicators of Readiness: ✔ Senior leaders prioritize procurement transformation.
✔ Executives provide clear sponsorship and communication about improvements.
Potential Barriers: ✘ Leaders have competing priorities and are not fully committed.
✘ Conflicting objectives between departments slow down decision-making.
Assessment Method:
✔ Schedule meetings with senior management to discuss alignment.
✔ Seek an executive sponsor to advocate for procurement reforms.
How Readiness Assessment Impacts Fred's Decision-Making
After evaluating the department's change readiness, Fred's approach to implementing changes will depend on the findings.
1. If Readiness is High:
Fred can proceed with bigger, transformative changes.
He can introduce automation tools, new supplier strategies, or restructuring initiatives.
A detailed change management plan should be developed, outlining: ✔ Timelines for implementation.
✔ Training programs to upskill employees.
✔ Performance metrics to track improvements.
2. If Readiness is Moderate:
Fred should implement gradual, phased changes rather than radical reforms.
He may need to educate employees on the benefits of change before pushing large initiatives.
Focus on quick wins that build momentum, such as: ✔ Small process optimizations.
✔ Minor policy adjustments.
✔ Pilot projects to test new ideas before full-scale rollout.
3. If Readiness is Low:
Fred must address employee concerns first before implementing major changes.
He should focus on communication and engagement to create a culture more open to change.
Strategies to increase readiness include: ✔ Organizing workshops and discussions to explain the need for change.
✔ Showcasing case studies of successful procurement transformations.
✔ Gaining senior leadership support to drive top-down change.
Conclusion
For Fred to successfully implement his procurement transformation ideas, he must first assess whether the department is ready for change. By evaluating organizational culture, employee mindset, process efficiency, resource availability, and senior management support, he can determine the right strategy-whether to proceed with radical changes, implement gradual improvements, or first increase change readiness. His decisions should be guided by employee engagement, clear communication, and alignment with business goals, ensuring that changes enhance procurement efficiency without causing unnecessary disruption.
Explanation:
Assessing Readiness for Change and Decision-Making: Fred's Approach as Head of Procurement Fred's recent promotion from Procurement Executive to Head of Procurement at Silly Name Company presents him with an opportunity to implement his ideas for departmental improvement. However, as someone who has worked in the same organization for 15 years, Fred must first assess the department's readiness for change before implementing radical reforms. Failure to do so could lead to resistance, disruption, and inefficiency. This essay explores how Fred can evaluate change readiness, and how this assessment will influence his decision-making.
Assessing the Readiness for Change
To successfully introduce changes in procurement, Fred must evaluate key factors that determine whether the department is ready to accept and implement new ideas.
1. Understanding the Organizational Culture
Fred should assess whether the company culture supports innovation and change or prefers stability and routine.
Indicators of Readiness: ✔ A culture that embraces innovation and continuous improvement.
✔ Employees who actively propose new ideas and improvements.
Potential Barriers: ✘ A culture resistant to change, where employees prefer "the way things have always been done."
✘ A history of failed change initiatives, causing skepticism.
Assessment Method:
✔ Surveys or feedback sessions to gauge employee attitudes toward change.
✔ Observing past change efforts-were they successful or met with resistance?
2. Evaluating Employee Buy-in and Mindset
Fred needs to assess whether employees are open to new ways of working or if they fear change due to job security concerns, workload increases, or lack of skills.
Indicators of Readiness: ✔ Employees express willingness to adopt new tools and processes.
✔ Staff members demonstrate adaptability to past procedural updates.
Potential Barriers: ✘ Employees fear that changes might make their jobs redundant.
✘ Resistance due to lack of understanding or training.
Assessment Method:
✔ Conduct one-on-one discussions or anonymous surveys on employee perceptions of change.
✔ Identify change champions who are enthusiastic about improvements.
3. Analyzing Current Processes and Pain Points
Before implementing radical changes, Fred must determine if current procurement processes are inefficient or if employees feel the need for change.
Indicators of Readiness: ✔ Procurement staff express frustration with outdated systems.
✔ Frequent delays, bottlenecks, or inefficiencies in procurement processes.
Potential Barriers: ✘ Employees feel the current processes work well enough and resist changing them.
✘ Lack of data to justify why new processes would be better than existing ones.
Assessment Method:
✔ Conduct a process audit to evaluate inefficiencies.
✔ Use KPIs (Key Performance Indicators) to measure procurement effectiveness.
4. Assessing Resource Availability
Even if the department is open to change, Fred must ensure there are sufficient resources (budget, technology, and expertise) to implement his ideas.
Indicators of Readiness: ✔ A budget exists to invest in new tools, training, or staff.
✔ The organization is willing to commit resources for change implementation.
Potential Barriers: ✘ Limited financial resources may delay or scale down initiatives.
✘ Employees lack the technical skills to adapt to new procurement methods.
Assessment Method:
✔ Check the procurement budget and forecast costs for proposed changes.
✔ Evaluate if the current team has the skills needed or requires training.
5. Leadership and Senior Management Support
Without support from senior management, Fred's efforts may not succeed. He must assess how committed leadership is to change.
Indicators of Readiness: ✔ Senior leaders prioritize procurement transformation.
✔ Executives provide clear sponsorship and communication about improvements.
Potential Barriers: ✘ Leaders have competing priorities and are not fully committed.
✘ Conflicting objectives between departments slow down decision-making.
Assessment Method:
✔ Schedule meetings with senior management to discuss alignment.
✔ Seek an executive sponsor to advocate for procurement reforms.
How Readiness Assessment Impacts Fred's Decision-Making
After evaluating the department's change readiness, Fred's approach to implementing changes will depend on the findings.
1. If Readiness is High:
Fred can proceed with bigger, transformative changes.
He can introduce automation tools, new supplier strategies, or restructuring initiatives.
A detailed change management plan should be developed, outlining: ✔ Timelines for implementation.
✔ Training programs to upskill employees.
✔ Performance metrics to track improvements.
2. If Readiness is Moderate:
Fred should implement gradual, phased changes rather than radical reforms.
He may need to educate employees on the benefits of change before pushing large initiatives.
Focus on quick wins that build momentum, such as: ✔ Small process optimizations.
✔ Minor policy adjustments.
✔ Pilot projects to test new ideas before full-scale rollout.
3. If Readiness is Low:
Fred must address employee concerns first before implementing major changes.
He should focus on communication and engagement to create a culture more open to change.
Strategies to increase readiness include: ✔ Organizing workshops and discussions to explain the need for change.
✔ Showcasing case studies of successful procurement transformations.
✔ Gaining senior leadership support to drive top-down change.
Conclusion
For Fred to successfully implement his procurement transformation ideas, he must first assess whether the department is ready for change. By evaluating organizational culture, employee mindset, process efficiency, resource availability, and senior management support, he can determine the right strategy-whether to proceed with radical changes, implement gradual improvements, or first increase change readiness. His decisions should be guided by employee engagement, clear communication, and alignment with business goals, ensuring that changes enhance procurement efficiency without causing unnecessary disruption.
SIMULATION
Explain the following types of dismissal: fair dismissal, unfair dismissal, summary dismissal, constructive dismissal and redundancy (15 points) How should an employee respond if they believe they believe that they have been let go by their employer unfairly? (10 points).
Explain the following types of dismissal: fair dismissal, unfair dismissal, summary dismissal, constructive dismissal and redundancy (15 points) How should an employee respond if they believe they believe that they have been let go by their employer unfairly? (10 points).
正解：
See the Answer is the explanation
Explanation:
Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Introduction - complex area of law
Section 1 - each type of dismissal, explain and example
Section 2- what they should do; use internal channels first, seek advice (union / Citizens Advice), mediation, litigation via Employment Tribunal.
Example Essay
Employment termination is a complex area of employment law, and different types of dismissal carry distinct legal implications. In the United Kingdom, where employment law is well-established, employees are entitled to certain rights and protections when facing dismissal. This essay explores various types of dismissal, including fair dismissal, unfair dismissal, summary dismissal, constructive dismissal, and redundancy. It also discusses how employees should respond if they believe they have been unfairly dismissed.
Types of Dismissal:
Fair Dismissal: Fair dismissal occurs when an employer terminates an employee's contract with valid reasons that are recognized by law. Common grounds for fair dismissal include misconduct, lack of capability and statutory reasons. For example, an employee consistently failing to perform their job despite adequate training and support may be fairly dismissed for capability.
Unfair Dismissal: Unfair dismissal, on the other hand, happens when an employee is terminated without valid reasons or if the employer fails to follow the correct dismissal procedures. Employees with at least two years of continuous service have protection against unfair dismissal. For example if XYZ Ltd fire Employee X who has worked at the company for 5 years because there is a personality clash between them and the management, Employee X could claim unfair dismissal (personality clash is not a valid reason for dismissal).
Summary Dismissal: Summary dismissal, often referred to as instant or gross misconduct dismissal, occurs when an employer terminates an employee's contract without notice due to severe misconduct. It typically involves serious breaches of workplace rules or the law. For example if an employee is caught stealing, they may be fired on the spot without notice.
Constructive Dismissal: Constructive dismissal occurs when an employee resigns from their position due to an employer's fundamental breach of the employment contract, creating an unbearable working environment. An example of this is if the employer fails to provide the worker with the correct PPE to complete the work (for example in the Construction industry). Because the employee is unable to complete the work safely, they resign. In this instance, the 'blame' is put firmly on the fault of the employer for 'making' the employee resign.
Redundancy: Redundancy takes place when an employer dismisses an employee because the job role they held no longer exists, or the employer's business needs to reduce its workforce. Redundancy dismissals must adhere to specific procedures and fair selection criteri a. In the UK this is referred to as TUPE.
If an employee believes that they are being fired unfairly they can claim unfair dismissal. Firstly, they should initially consider raising their concerns internally through the company's grievance procedure. This allows for a formal process where grievances can be investigated and addressed. This is particularly useful in large organisations where workers may be fired by middle-managers who are not properly trained or aware of the legislation regarding this area. By raising a concern through a grievance policy, it allows the right people in the company such as HR or the senior leadership team, to fully assess the situation.
Secondly, the employee should seek advice from an organisation such as Citizen's Advice or their workers' union. They will be able to advise if the situation does amount to unfair dismissal. Getting a third party involved can help to bring in a new perspective and keep discussions positive and moving forward.
If it is believed that the unfair dismissal has merit, employees can contact ACAS (Advisory, Conciliation, and Arbitration Service) for early conciliation. ACAS may facilitate settlement discussions between the employee and employer to avoid legal proceedings. If internal processes and ACAS conciliation do not resolve the matter, employees can file a claim with the Employment Tribunal within specified time limits, asserting unfair dismissal. The time limit to claim is currently 3 months minus a day from the date you were dismissed. Employees may seek legal advice and representation during Employment Tribunal proceedings to ensure their rights are protected and they receive appropriate compensation if the claim is successful.
In conclusion, various types of dismissal exist, each with distinct legal implications. Employees should be aware of their rights and protections under UK employment law, particularly concerning unfair dismissal. It is important to remember that 'employment rights' in the UK are only granted after 2 years of service, and this is often a big factor when looking at this area of law. It is important for all employees in the UK to understand these types of dismissal as having appropriate responses empowers employees to seek redress when faced with unjust termination.
Explanation:
Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Introduction - complex area of law
Section 1 - each type of dismissal, explain and example
Section 2- what they should do; use internal channels first, seek advice (union / Citizens Advice), mediation, litigation via Employment Tribunal.
Example Essay
Employment termination is a complex area of employment law, and different types of dismissal carry distinct legal implications. In the United Kingdom, where employment law is well-established, employees are entitled to certain rights and protections when facing dismissal. This essay explores various types of dismissal, including fair dismissal, unfair dismissal, summary dismissal, constructive dismissal, and redundancy. It also discusses how employees should respond if they believe they have been unfairly dismissed.
Types of Dismissal:
Fair Dismissal: Fair dismissal occurs when an employer terminates an employee's contract with valid reasons that are recognized by law. Common grounds for fair dismissal include misconduct, lack of capability and statutory reasons. For example, an employee consistently failing to perform their job despite adequate training and support may be fairly dismissed for capability.
Unfair Dismissal: Unfair dismissal, on the other hand, happens when an employee is terminated without valid reasons or if the employer fails to follow the correct dismissal procedures. Employees with at least two years of continuous service have protection against unfair dismissal. For example if XYZ Ltd fire Employee X who has worked at the company for 5 years because there is a personality clash between them and the management, Employee X could claim unfair dismissal (personality clash is not a valid reason for dismissal).
Summary Dismissal: Summary dismissal, often referred to as instant or gross misconduct dismissal, occurs when an employer terminates an employee's contract without notice due to severe misconduct. It typically involves serious breaches of workplace rules or the law. For example if an employee is caught stealing, they may be fired on the spot without notice.
Constructive Dismissal: Constructive dismissal occurs when an employee resigns from their position due to an employer's fundamental breach of the employment contract, creating an unbearable working environment. An example of this is if the employer fails to provide the worker with the correct PPE to complete the work (for example in the Construction industry). Because the employee is unable to complete the work safely, they resign. In this instance, the 'blame' is put firmly on the fault of the employer for 'making' the employee resign.
Redundancy: Redundancy takes place when an employer dismisses an employee because the job role they held no longer exists, or the employer's business needs to reduce its workforce. Redundancy dismissals must adhere to specific procedures and fair selection criteri a. In the UK this is referred to as TUPE.
If an employee believes that they are being fired unfairly they can claim unfair dismissal. Firstly, they should initially consider raising their concerns internally through the company's grievance procedure. This allows for a formal process where grievances can be investigated and addressed. This is particularly useful in large organisations where workers may be fired by middle-managers who are not properly trained or aware of the legislation regarding this area. By raising a concern through a grievance policy, it allows the right people in the company such as HR or the senior leadership team, to fully assess the situation.
Secondly, the employee should seek advice from an organisation such as Citizen's Advice or their workers' union. They will be able to advise if the situation does amount to unfair dismissal. Getting a third party involved can help to bring in a new perspective and keep discussions positive and moving forward.
If it is believed that the unfair dismissal has merit, employees can contact ACAS (Advisory, Conciliation, and Arbitration Service) for early conciliation. ACAS may facilitate settlement discussions between the employee and employer to avoid legal proceedings. If internal processes and ACAS conciliation do not resolve the matter, employees can file a claim with the Employment Tribunal within specified time limits, asserting unfair dismissal. The time limit to claim is currently 3 months minus a day from the date you were dismissed. Employees may seek legal advice and representation during Employment Tribunal proceedings to ensure their rights are protected and they receive appropriate compensation if the claim is successful.
In conclusion, various types of dismissal exist, each with distinct legal implications. Employees should be aware of their rights and protections under UK employment law, particularly concerning unfair dismissal. It is important to remember that 'employment rights' in the UK are only granted after 2 years of service, and this is often a big factor when looking at this area of law. It is important for all employees in the UK to understand these types of dismissal as having appropriate responses empowers employees to seek redress when faced with unjust termination.
SIMULATION
Discuss transformational and transactional approaches to leadership. Which is the most appropriate approach in the following case study:
Mo is a procurement manager at a large manufacturing organisation. He oversees a team of 5 procurement assistants. The assistants are currently not working to a high level; they lack skills and confidence in completing tenders and Mo is concerned about their abilities to conduct accurate work. (25 points)
Discuss transformational and transactional approaches to leadership. Which is the most appropriate approach in the following case study:
Mo is a procurement manager at a large manufacturing organisation. He oversees a team of 5 procurement assistants. The assistants are currently not working to a high level; they lack skills and confidence in completing tenders and Mo is concerned about their abilities to conduct accurate work. (25 points)
正解：
See the Answer is the explanation
Explanation:
Introduction
Leadership is a critical factor in shaping employee performance, motivation, and overall organizational success. In procurement, managers must adopt a leadership style that aligns with their team's capabilities, business objectives, and operational challenges. Two widely recognized leadership styles are Transformational Leadership and Transactional Leadership, each with distinct characteristics and effects on team performance.
This essay will discuss both leadership styles, outlining their advantages and disadvantages. It will then evaluate which approach is best suited for Mo, a procurement manager facing skill and confidence issues among his team members.
Understanding Transformational Leadership
Definition
Transformational leadership is a leadership style that focuses on inspiring, motivating, and developing employees to reach their full potential. Transformational leaders act as mentors and role models, encouraging innovation, professional growth, and long-term performance improvements.
Key Characteristics of Transformational Leadership
Inspiration and Motivation - The leader encourages employees to perform beyond expectations through a compelling vision.
Individualized Support - Focuses on mentoring and coaching employees to enhance their skills.
Encourages Innovation - Employees are empowered to think creatively and solve problems.
Develops Future Leaders - Focuses on long-term talent development rather than short-term task completion.
High Engagement and Emotional Intelligence - Builds strong relationships with employees and fosters a positive workplace culture.
Advantages of Transformational Leadership
✅ Encourages professional growth - Employees develop new skills and gain confidence.
✅ Increases motivation and job satisfaction - Employees feel valued and supported.
✅ Promotes innovation and continuous improvement - Encourages employees to think creatively.
✅ Builds long-term organizational success - Creates future leaders through mentoring and skill development.
Disadvantages of Transformational Leadership
❌ Time-consuming - Requires significant time and effort for mentoring and development.
❌ Not suitable for urgent performance issues - If immediate performance improvement is needed, transformational leadership may be too slow.
❌ Employees may resist change - Some employees may be unwilling to embrace coaching and new expectations.
Understanding Transactional Leadership
Definition
Transactional leadership is a leadership style based on a structured, performance-driven approach. It focuses on clear expectations, rewards for success, and consequences for underperformance. This style is best suited for improving task efficiency, enforcing compliance, and ensuring consistency.
Key Characteristics of Transactional Leadership
Clear Expectations and Rules - Employees have defined roles and responsibilities.
Performance-Based Rewards and Punishments - Good performance is rewarded, while poor performance is corrected through disciplinary actions.
Focus on Efficiency and Results - Emphasizes productivity and operational efficiency over employee growth.
Short-Term Performance Goals - Ensures immediate improvements in employee performance.
Hierarchy and Structure - Follows a strict chain of command.
Advantages of Transactional Leadership
✅ Ensures short-term efficiency and compliance - Clearly defines expectations, which leads to immediate improvements in performance.
✅ Effective for structured tasks - Employees know exactly what is expected, reducing uncertainty.
✅ Increases accountability - Employees are held responsible for meeting targets.
✅ Useful for crisis management - Provides a clear directive in high-pressure situations.
Disadvantages of Transactional Leadership
❌ Limited employee development - Focuses more on task completion rather than skill enhancement.
❌ Can reduce creativity and innovation - Employees may feel restricted by rigid expectations.
❌ May reduce motivation - Over-reliance on rules and punishments can create a negative work environment.
❌ Not ideal for building long-term talent - Employees may not develop leadership skills or confidence.
Which Leadership Style is Most Suitable for Mo?
Case Study Analysis: Mo's Leadership Challenge
Mo is a procurement manager leading a team of 5 procurement assistants.
The assistants are underperforming due to lack of skills and confidence.
Mo is concerned about their ability to complete procurement tenders accurately.
Evaluating the Best Leadership Approach for Mo
Based on the specific challenges Mo is facing, neither leadership style alone is perfect. Instead, a combined approach is most suitable:
Recommended Approach: A Blend of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Short-Term Approach: Transactional Leadership for Immediate Performance Improvement Mo should set clear expectations and enforce accountability to ensure the assistants improve their performance in procurement tenders.
Implement a structured training program with performance benchmarks.
Use performance-based incentives (e.g., bonuses, recognition for accurate work).
Provide constructive feedback on mistakes to encourage learning.
Long-Term Approach: Transformational Leadership for Skill Development and Confidence Mo should act as a mentor and coach, providing continuous learning opportunities.
Encourage assistants to develop confidence in procurement by assigning them progressively challenging tasks.
Inspire the team by highlighting the importance of procurement excellence in achieving organizational goals.
Implement peer learning and mentorship programs to create a supportive learning environment.
Conclusion
Both Transformational Leadership and Transactional Leadership offer valuable benefits, but in the case of Mo's underperforming team, a blended approach is the most effective strategy.
Transactional Leadership should be used in the short term to improve immediate performance, enforce accountability, and ensure accuracy in procurement tenders.
Transformational Leadership should be introduced gradually to develop skills, boost confidence, and foster long-term career growth among the procurement assistants.
By combining both approaches, Mo can quickly improve his team's performance while ensuring they gain the necessary skills and confidence to succeed in procurement. This balanced leadership approach ensures short-term efficiency and long-term growth, making it the most effective strategy for Mo's situation.
Explanation:
Introduction
Leadership is a critical factor in shaping employee performance, motivation, and overall organizational success. In procurement, managers must adopt a leadership style that aligns with their team's capabilities, business objectives, and operational challenges. Two widely recognized leadership styles are Transformational Leadership and Transactional Leadership, each with distinct characteristics and effects on team performance.
This essay will discuss both leadership styles, outlining their advantages and disadvantages. It will then evaluate which approach is best suited for Mo, a procurement manager facing skill and confidence issues among his team members.
Understanding Transformational Leadership
Definition
Transformational leadership is a leadership style that focuses on inspiring, motivating, and developing employees to reach their full potential. Transformational leaders act as mentors and role models, encouraging innovation, professional growth, and long-term performance improvements.
Key Characteristics of Transformational Leadership
Inspiration and Motivation - The leader encourages employees to perform beyond expectations through a compelling vision.
Individualized Support - Focuses on mentoring and coaching employees to enhance their skills.
Encourages Innovation - Employees are empowered to think creatively and solve problems.
Develops Future Leaders - Focuses on long-term talent development rather than short-term task completion.
High Engagement and Emotional Intelligence - Builds strong relationships with employees and fosters a positive workplace culture.
Advantages of Transformational Leadership
✅ Encourages professional growth - Employees develop new skills and gain confidence.
✅ Increases motivation and job satisfaction - Employees feel valued and supported.
✅ Promotes innovation and continuous improvement - Encourages employees to think creatively.
✅ Builds long-term organizational success - Creates future leaders through mentoring and skill development.
Disadvantages of Transformational Leadership
❌ Time-consuming - Requires significant time and effort for mentoring and development.
❌ Not suitable for urgent performance issues - If immediate performance improvement is needed, transformational leadership may be too slow.
❌ Employees may resist change - Some employees may be unwilling to embrace coaching and new expectations.
Understanding Transactional Leadership
Definition
Transactional leadership is a leadership style based on a structured, performance-driven approach. It focuses on clear expectations, rewards for success, and consequences for underperformance. This style is best suited for improving task efficiency, enforcing compliance, and ensuring consistency.
Key Characteristics of Transactional Leadership
Clear Expectations and Rules - Employees have defined roles and responsibilities.
Performance-Based Rewards and Punishments - Good performance is rewarded, while poor performance is corrected through disciplinary actions.
Focus on Efficiency and Results - Emphasizes productivity and operational efficiency over employee growth.
Short-Term Performance Goals - Ensures immediate improvements in employee performance.
Hierarchy and Structure - Follows a strict chain of command.
Advantages of Transactional Leadership
✅ Ensures short-term efficiency and compliance - Clearly defines expectations, which leads to immediate improvements in performance.
✅ Effective for structured tasks - Employees know exactly what is expected, reducing uncertainty.
✅ Increases accountability - Employees are held responsible for meeting targets.
✅ Useful for crisis management - Provides a clear directive in high-pressure situations.
Disadvantages of Transactional Leadership
❌ Limited employee development - Focuses more on task completion rather than skill enhancement.
❌ Can reduce creativity and innovation - Employees may feel restricted by rigid expectations.
❌ May reduce motivation - Over-reliance on rules and punishments can create a negative work environment.
❌ Not ideal for building long-term talent - Employees may not develop leadership skills or confidence.
Which Leadership Style is Most Suitable for Mo?
Case Study Analysis: Mo's Leadership Challenge
Mo is a procurement manager leading a team of 5 procurement assistants.
The assistants are underperforming due to lack of skills and confidence.
Mo is concerned about their ability to complete procurement tenders accurately.
Evaluating the Best Leadership Approach for Mo
Based on the specific challenges Mo is facing, neither leadership style alone is perfect. Instead, a combined approach is most suitable:
Recommended Approach: A Blend of Transformational and Transactional Leadership Short-Term Approach: Transactional Leadership for Immediate Performance Improvement Mo should set clear expectations and enforce accountability to ensure the assistants improve their performance in procurement tenders.
Implement a structured training program with performance benchmarks.
Use performance-based incentives (e.g., bonuses, recognition for accurate work).
Provide constructive feedback on mistakes to encourage learning.
Long-Term Approach: Transformational Leadership for Skill Development and Confidence Mo should act as a mentor and coach, providing continuous learning opportunities.
Encourage assistants to develop confidence in procurement by assigning them progressively challenging tasks.
Inspire the team by highlighting the importance of procurement excellence in achieving organizational goals.
Implement peer learning and mentorship programs to create a supportive learning environment.
Conclusion
Both Transformational Leadership and Transactional Leadership offer valuable benefits, but in the case of Mo's underperforming team, a blended approach is the most effective strategy.
Transactional Leadership should be used in the short term to improve immediate performance, enforce accountability, and ensure accuracy in procurement tenders.
Transformational Leadership should be introduced gradually to develop skills, boost confidence, and foster long-term career growth among the procurement assistants.
By combining both approaches, Mo can quickly improve his team's performance while ensuring they gain the necessary skills and confidence to succeed in procurement. This balanced leadership approach ensures short-term efficiency and long-term growth, making it the most effective strategy for Mo's situation.
SIMULATION
Explain how Modern Slavery is a risk to a supply chain and possible ways a Supply Chain Manager can mitigate this risk (25 points)
Explain how Modern Slavery is a risk to a supply chain and possible ways a Supply Chain Manager can mitigate this risk (25 points)
正解：
See the Answer is the explanation
Explanation:
Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Introduction - modern slavery is an issue due to complex international supply chains P1 - risk - subcontracting or outsourcing P2 - risk - lack of visibility P3 - risk - other countries not having strong laws against it P4 - mitigate - supplier due diligence P5 - mitigate - traceability e.g. blockchain P6 - mitigate - training P7 - mitigate - collaboration and reporting P8 - example - DJ Houghton Conclusion - modern slavery is risk legally and ethically and also to business reputation Example Essay Modern slavery, a grave violation of human rights, poses a significant risk to supply chains across the globe. As organizations increasingly rely on complex and globalized supply networks, the risk of unwittingly engaging with suppliers that exploit forced labour and human trafficking becomes ever more concerning. This essay explores the risks associated with modern slavery in the supply chain and suggests possible mitigation strategies for supply chain managers. To illustrate the real-world implications of these risks, I will reference the legal case of Antuzis & Ors v DJ Houghton Ltd.
Modern slavery, which includes practices like forced labour and human trafficking, can infiltrate supply chains in various ways. One significant entry point is through subcontracting and outsourcing. As supply chains become increasingly complex, organizations often rely on subcontractors and suppliers further down the chain. Unfortunately, these lower-tier suppliers may engage in exploitative labour practices to cut costs, which can go unnoticed by the primary organization.
Moreover, the lack of transparency within supply chains poses a considerable risk. Limited visibility into sub-tier suppliers and subcontractors makes it challenging to assess their labour practices. This lack of transparency creates opportunities for modern slavery to thrive undetected, posing a significant risk to organizations and their stakeholders.
Additionally, globalization plays a role in the risk equation. Sourcing materials and products internationally increases the risk of encountering suppliers operating in regions with weaker labour protections and lax enforcement of anti-slavery laws. This is particularly true in countries with less stringent child working laws such as in South East Asia.
Supply chain managers play a crucial role in identifying and mitigating the risk of modern slavery in the supply chain. Several strategies can be employed to address this risk effectively:
Firstly, comprehensive supplier due diligence is paramount. This involves conducting thorough assessments of suppliers, including lower-tier suppliers, to evaluate their labour practices, compliance with anti-slavery laws, and adherence to ethical standards. It also entails implementing regular audits and inspections of suppliers to ensure compliance with labour laws and ethical standards. An organisation can employ a third party to conduct these audits, to ensure that the results are authentic.
Secondly, establishing transparency and traceability within the supply chain is essential. This can be achieved by meticulously mapping the supply chain, identifying potential risks, and ensuring visibility into lower-tier suppliers. Modern technology, such as blockchain and supply chain management software, can be instrumental in tracking and tracing the origins of products and materials.
Thirdly, organizations should develop and communicate a robust supplier code of conduct that explicitly prohibits modern slavery and outlines the consequences for non-compliance. Encouraging suppliers to adopt similar codes of conduct within their own operations can help create a network of ethical supply chain partners.
Moreover, regular risk assessments and impact analyses are critical. These assessments should consider geographical, industry-specific, and supplier-specific factors and help organizations understand the potential consequences of modern slavery-related risks on their reputation and bottom line.
Training and education are also essential components of mitigation strategies. Employees and suppliers should be educated on identifying and reporting instances of modern slavery, and awareness should be raised about the legal and ethical obligations surrounding this issue.
Lastly, collaboration and reporting are crucial. Organizations should collaborate with industry associations, NGOs, and government bodies to share best practices and improve industry-wide efforts against modern slavery. Transparent reporting on efforts to mitigate modern slavery risks demonstrates a commitment to addressing the issue and fosters trust with stakeholders.
The case of Antuzis & Ors v DJ Houghton Ltd serves as a stark reminder of the potential legal consequences of failing to address modern slavery in the supply chain. In this case, the court found that the company, DJ Houghton Ltd, had subjected workers to deplorable working conditions, effectively amounting to modern slavery. What sets this case apart is that the court held the directors personally liable for breaches of their duty of care to the workers. This case underscores the legal liabilities and reputational damage that organizations and their leadership can face if they neglect their responsibilities in the supply chain.
In Conclusion, modern slavery poses a significant risk to supply chains, jeopardizing ethical values, legal compliance, and corporate reputations. Supply chain managers have a crucial role in identifying and mitigating this risk by implementing due diligence, transparency measures, and ethical standards. By taking proactive steps to combat modern slavery, supply chain managers can protect their organizations and uphold their moral and legal obligations in an increasingly interconnected global economy. The case of Antuzis & Ors v DJ Houghton Ltd serves as a compelling reminder of the real-world consequences of failing to address this critical issue Tutor Notes
- The case study mentioned above is an excellent one to use in an essay about Modern Slavery. DJ Houghton Ltd was charged £1m in 2016 for trafficking migrant workers from Lithuania to various egg farms in the UK. They were subjected to inhumane conditions, income below minimum wage, they failed to provide adequate facilities to eat, wash and rest, and threatened workers with fighting dogs. The company's Gangmaster Licence was also revoked. Antuzis & Ors v DJ Houghton Ltd | Addleshaw Goddard LLP
- Your answer may also make reference to ethical standards and accreditations such as Fair Trade, using the CIPS Code of Conduct, Modern Slavery Act, having a strong CSR policy, appointing an ethical Ombudsman, ILO Conventions and the 2018 Decent Work Agenda, SA8000. Mentioning these extra bits would likely get you a distinction.
Explanation:
Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Introduction - modern slavery is an issue due to complex international supply chains P1 - risk - subcontracting or outsourcing P2 - risk - lack of visibility P3 - risk - other countries not having strong laws against it P4 - mitigate - supplier due diligence P5 - mitigate - traceability e.g. blockchain P6 - mitigate - training P7 - mitigate - collaboration and reporting P8 - example - DJ Houghton Conclusion - modern slavery is risk legally and ethically and also to business reputation Example Essay Modern slavery, a grave violation of human rights, poses a significant risk to supply chains across the globe. As organizations increasingly rely on complex and globalized supply networks, the risk of unwittingly engaging with suppliers that exploit forced labour and human trafficking becomes ever more concerning. This essay explores the risks associated with modern slavery in the supply chain and suggests possible mitigation strategies for supply chain managers. To illustrate the real-world implications of these risks, I will reference the legal case of Antuzis & Ors v DJ Houghton Ltd.
Modern slavery, which includes practices like forced labour and human trafficking, can infiltrate supply chains in various ways. One significant entry point is through subcontracting and outsourcing. As supply chains become increasingly complex, organizations often rely on subcontractors and suppliers further down the chain. Unfortunately, these lower-tier suppliers may engage in exploitative labour practices to cut costs, which can go unnoticed by the primary organization.
Moreover, the lack of transparency within supply chains poses a considerable risk. Limited visibility into sub-tier suppliers and subcontractors makes it challenging to assess their labour practices. This lack of transparency creates opportunities for modern slavery to thrive undetected, posing a significant risk to organizations and their stakeholders.
Additionally, globalization plays a role in the risk equation. Sourcing materials and products internationally increases the risk of encountering suppliers operating in regions with weaker labour protections and lax enforcement of anti-slavery laws. This is particularly true in countries with less stringent child working laws such as in South East Asia.
Supply chain managers play a crucial role in identifying and mitigating the risk of modern slavery in the supply chain. Several strategies can be employed to address this risk effectively:
Firstly, comprehensive supplier due diligence is paramount. This involves conducting thorough assessments of suppliers, including lower-tier suppliers, to evaluate their labour practices, compliance with anti-slavery laws, and adherence to ethical standards. It also entails implementing regular audits and inspections of suppliers to ensure compliance with labour laws and ethical standards. An organisation can employ a third party to conduct these audits, to ensure that the results are authentic.
Secondly, establishing transparency and traceability within the supply chain is essential. This can be achieved by meticulously mapping the supply chain, identifying potential risks, and ensuring visibility into lower-tier suppliers. Modern technology, such as blockchain and supply chain management software, can be instrumental in tracking and tracing the origins of products and materials.
Thirdly, organizations should develop and communicate a robust supplier code of conduct that explicitly prohibits modern slavery and outlines the consequences for non-compliance. Encouraging suppliers to adopt similar codes of conduct within their own operations can help create a network of ethical supply chain partners.
Moreover, regular risk assessments and impact analyses are critical. These assessments should consider geographical, industry-specific, and supplier-specific factors and help organizations understand the potential consequences of modern slavery-related risks on their reputation and bottom line.
Training and education are also essential components of mitigation strategies. Employees and suppliers should be educated on identifying and reporting instances of modern slavery, and awareness should be raised about the legal and ethical obligations surrounding this issue.
Lastly, collaboration and reporting are crucial. Organizations should collaborate with industry associations, NGOs, and government bodies to share best practices and improve industry-wide efforts against modern slavery. Transparent reporting on efforts to mitigate modern slavery risks demonstrates a commitment to addressing the issue and fosters trust with stakeholders.
The case of Antuzis & Ors v DJ Houghton Ltd serves as a stark reminder of the potential legal consequences of failing to address modern slavery in the supply chain. In this case, the court found that the company, DJ Houghton Ltd, had subjected workers to deplorable working conditions, effectively amounting to modern slavery. What sets this case apart is that the court held the directors personally liable for breaches of their duty of care to the workers. This case underscores the legal liabilities and reputational damage that organizations and their leadership can face if they neglect their responsibilities in the supply chain.
In Conclusion, modern slavery poses a significant risk to supply chains, jeopardizing ethical values, legal compliance, and corporate reputations. Supply chain managers have a crucial role in identifying and mitigating this risk by implementing due diligence, transparency measures, and ethical standards. By taking proactive steps to combat modern slavery, supply chain managers can protect their organizations and uphold their moral and legal obligations in an increasingly interconnected global economy. The case of Antuzis & Ors v DJ Houghton Ltd serves as a compelling reminder of the real-world consequences of failing to address this critical issue Tutor Notes
- The case study mentioned above is an excellent one to use in an essay about Modern Slavery. DJ Houghton Ltd was charged £1m in 2016 for trafficking migrant workers from Lithuania to various egg farms in the UK. They were subjected to inhumane conditions, income below minimum wage, they failed to provide adequate facilities to eat, wash and rest, and threatened workers with fighting dogs. The company's Gangmaster Licence was also revoked. Antuzis & Ors v DJ Houghton Ltd | Addleshaw Goddard LLP
- Your answer may also make reference to ethical standards and accreditations such as Fair Trade, using the CIPS Code of Conduct, Modern Slavery Act, having a strong CSR policy, appointing an ethical Ombudsman, ILO Conventions and the 2018 Decent Work Agenda, SA8000. Mentioning these extra bits would likely get you a distinction.
SIMULATION
Discuss two different types of power that could be used within the Procurement department of an organisation. Explain how procurement can use power responsibly to help the organization achieve its strategic objectives. (25 points).
Discuss two different types of power that could be used within the Procurement department of an organisation. Explain how procurement can use power responsibly to help the organization achieve its strategic objectives. (25 points).
正解：
See the Answer is the explanation
Explanation:
Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Introduction - definition of power and Max Weber
P1 - charismatic power
P2 - rational/ legal
P3 - using power responsibly: training others, accountability/ setting procedures, ethical sourcing Conclusion - procurement has a lot of power in an organisation. The key to using power is 'balance' and using it responsibly Example Essay Power, in the context of organizations, refers to the ability of individuals or departments to influence decisions, actions, and outcomes. Max Weber, a German Sociologist, identified three types of power: charismatic, traditional, and rational/legal. In this essay, we will focus on two types of power relevant to the Procurement department - charismatic power and rational/legal power. Additionally, we will explore how Procurement can responsibly use these powers to help the organization achieve its strategic objectives.
Charismatic power refers to a type of influence or authority that is based on the personal qualities, charisma, and appeal of an individual leader. This form of power arises from the compelling and magnetic personality of a leader, which inspires and motivates followers to willingly and enthusiastically support their vision and goals. One well-known example of a charismatic leader is Steve Jobs, the co-founder of Apple. Charismatic leaders have the ability to inspire and motivate their followers to achieve goals that might seem challenging or even impossible. They often articulate a compelling vision for the future and communicate it in a way that resonates with others. Moreover, they exude confidence and enthusiasm, which can be contagious. Their passion and belief in their vision can energize and mobilize their followers. For this reason, this type of power is often linked with Transformational Leadership styles.
Rational/legal power is derived from established policies, procedures, and regulations that govern business processes. It relies on adherence to legal and ethical standards, ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability. Rational/legal power is typically exercised in an impersonal and formal manner. Rather than being contingent on the personal qualities of an individual as with charismatic power, rational/ legal power is derived from a person's position within a formal organizational hierarchy. Weber associated rational/legal power with bureaucratic structures, where authority is distributed hierarchically, and individuals hold positions based on their qualifications, expertise, and adherence to established rules. For example, in the Procurement department of an organisation, the Head of Procurement would hold Rational/ Legal power through their ability to sign-off on the activities of others. This form of power emphasizes predictability and consistency in decision-making. Weber points out the downside to this type of power: that leaders with this type of power can be inflexible and rigid.
In an organisation, the Procurement department would use a mixture of charismatic and rational/ legal power in order to help the organisation achieve their strategic objectives. Some ways this could materialise include:
Training: Procurement can use a mixture of charismatic and rational power responsibly by providing training to other departments on aspects of procurement, especially compliance with legislation (which is critical in the public sector) and achieving value for money. This ensures that the organization's practices align with legal requirements and maximize cost-efficiency. Delivering training requires rational power (the training leader needs to know what they're talking about and have experience in this), but also charismatic power in order to engage learners. By training other departments, this will help the organisation achieve its strategic objectives.
Accountability and Reporting: Procurement can responsibly exercise rational/legal power by establishing clear accountability and reporting mechanisms. This includes ensuring that procurement decisions are documented, transparent, and in compliance with relevant laws and regulations. An example of this is creating Standard Operating Procedures, or ensuring Junior members of the team get approval from a Line Manager to conduct certain activities. This helps the organisation achieve strategic goals by eliminating (or significantly reducing) its exposure to risk.
Ethical Sourcing: Procurement can use power to address critical issues such as human trafficking within the supply chain. By setting and enforcing ethical sourcing standards, they contribute to responsible procurement practices. Procurement can use charismatic power to convince senior leadership and supply partners of the importance of ethical sourcing, and legitimate power to ensure that all stakeholders are complying with CSR policies. This could involve the use of gain-share mechanisms in contracts with supply partners.
In conclusion, Procurement departments wield considerable power within organizations, and the key to using this power is balance and responsibility. Charismatic and rational/legal powers can be harnessed to drive and achieve strategic objectives by ensuring ethical, compliant, and efficient procurement practices. By training, identifying vulnerabilities, and promoting responsible sourcing, Procurement contributes to the organization's overall success.
Tutor Notes
- You could bring in many different theories when describing two types of power. I've chosen two by Max Weber (he talks about 3 - charismatic, traditional and rational/ legal). But you could have used some from French and Raven (expert, legitimate, coercive, reward, referent) or Yukl (2010) - connection power and negative power. There are others too, these are just the main ones explored in the study guide
- A similar question was asked in March 22 but power is a big topic so may come up again, either with or without a case study. Another way they could use this topic is discussing ways of using the different power types to overcome issues.
- Weber's Types of Power - p. 171. How procurement can use power responsibly - p.177
Explanation:
Overall explanation
Below you will find how you can plan and draft the essay. Remember this is an example of one way you could approach the question. At Level 6 the questions are much more open so your response may be completely different and that's okay.
Essay Plan
Introduction - definition of power and Max Weber
P1 - charismatic power
P2 - rational/ legal
P3 - using power responsibly: training others, accountability/ setting procedures, ethical sourcing Conclusion - procurement has a lot of power in an organisation. The key to using power is 'balance' and using it responsibly Example Essay Power, in the context of organizations, refers to the ability of individuals or departments to influence decisions, actions, and outcomes. Max Weber, a German Sociologist, identified three types of power: charismatic, traditional, and rational/legal. In this essay, we will focus on two types of power relevant to the Procurement department - charismatic power and rational/legal power. Additionally, we will explore how Procurement can responsibly use these powers to help the organization achieve its strategic objectives.
Charismatic power refers to a type of influence or authority that is based on the personal qualities, charisma, and appeal of an individual leader. This form of power arises from the compelling and magnetic personality of a leader, which inspires and motivates followers to willingly and enthusiastically support their vision and goals. One well-known example of a charismatic leader is Steve Jobs, the co-founder of Apple. Charismatic leaders have the ability to inspire and motivate their followers to achieve goals that might seem challenging or even impossible. They often articulate a compelling vision for the future and communicate it in a way that resonates with others. Moreover, they exude confidence and enthusiasm, which can be contagious. Their passion and belief in their vision can energize and mobilize their followers. For this reason, this type of power is often linked with Transformational Leadership styles.
Rational/legal power is derived from established policies, procedures, and regulations that govern business processes. It relies on adherence to legal and ethical standards, ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability. Rational/legal power is typically exercised in an impersonal and formal manner. Rather than being contingent on the personal qualities of an individual as with charismatic power, rational/ legal power is derived from a person's position within a formal organizational hierarchy. Weber associated rational/legal power with bureaucratic structures, where authority is distributed hierarchically, and individuals hold positions based on their qualifications, expertise, and adherence to established rules. For example, in the Procurement department of an organisation, the Head of Procurement would hold Rational/ Legal power through their ability to sign-off on the activities of others. This form of power emphasizes predictability and consistency in decision-making. Weber points out the downside to this type of power: that leaders with this type of power can be inflexible and rigid.
In an organisation, the Procurement department would use a mixture of charismatic and rational/ legal power in order to help the organisation achieve their strategic objectives. Some ways this could materialise include:
Training: Procurement can use a mixture of charismatic and rational power responsibly by providing training to other departments on aspects of procurement, especially compliance with legislation (which is critical in the public sector) and achieving value for money. This ensures that the organization's practices align with legal requirements and maximize cost-efficiency. Delivering training requires rational power (the training leader needs to know what they're talking about and have experience in this), but also charismatic power in order to engage learners. By training other departments, this will help the organisation achieve its strategic objectives.
Accountability and Reporting: Procurement can responsibly exercise rational/legal power by establishing clear accountability and reporting mechanisms. This includes ensuring that procurement decisions are documented, transparent, and in compliance with relevant laws and regulations. An example of this is creating Standard Operating Procedures, or ensuring Junior members of the team get approval from a Line Manager to conduct certain activities. This helps the organisation achieve strategic goals by eliminating (or significantly reducing) its exposure to risk.
Ethical Sourcing: Procurement can use power to address critical issues such as human trafficking within the supply chain. By setting and enforcing ethical sourcing standards, they contribute to responsible procurement practices. Procurement can use charismatic power to convince senior leadership and supply partners of the importance of ethical sourcing, and legitimate power to ensure that all stakeholders are complying with CSR policies. This could involve the use of gain-share mechanisms in contracts with supply partners.
In conclusion, Procurement departments wield considerable power within organizations, and the key to using this power is balance and responsibility. Charismatic and rational/legal powers can be harnessed to drive and achieve strategic objectives by ensuring ethical, compliant, and efficient procurement practices. By training, identifying vulnerabilities, and promoting responsible sourcing, Procurement contributes to the organization's overall success.
Tutor Notes
- You could bring in many different theories when describing two types of power. I've chosen two by Max Weber (he talks about 3 - charismatic, traditional and rational/ legal). But you could have used some from French and Raven (expert, legitimate, coercive, reward, referent) or Yukl (2010) - connection power and negative power. There are others too, these are just the main ones explored in the study guide
- A similar question was asked in March 22 but power is a big topic so may come up again, either with or without a case study. Another way they could use this topic is discussing ways of using the different power types to overcome issues.
- Weber's Types of Power - p. 171. How procurement can use power responsibly - p.177