MCIA-Level-1-Maintenance 無料問題集「MuleSoft Certified Integration Architect - Level 1 MAINTENANCE」

An organization has decided on a cloud migration strategy to minimize the organization's own IT resources.
Currently the organization has all of its new applications running on its own premises and uses an on-premises load balancer that exposes all APIs under the base URL (https://api.rutujar.com).
As part of migration strategy, the organization is planning to migrate all of its new applications and load balancer CloudHub.
What is the most straightforward and cost-effective approach to Mule application deployment and load balancing that preserves the public URL's?

Which of the below requirements prevent the usage of Anypoint MQ in a company's network?(Choose two answers)

正解:A、C 解答を投票する
An organization is evaluating using the CloudHub shared Load Balancer (SLB) vs creating a CloudHub dedicated load balancer (DLB). They are evaluating how this choice affects the various types of certificates used by CloudHub deployed Mule applications, including MuleSoft-provided, customer-provided, or Mule application-provided certificates. What type of restrictions exist on the types of certificates for the service that can be exposed by the CloudHub Shared Load Balancer (SLB) to external web clients over the public internet?

解説: (JPNTest メンバーにのみ表示されます)
A Mule application is built to support a local transaction for a series of operations on a single database. The Mule application has a Scatter-Gather that participates in the local transaction.
What is the behavior of the Scatter-Gather when running within this local transaction?

A Mule application is synchronizing customer data between two different database systems.
What is the main benefit of using eXtended Architecture (XA) transactions over local transactions to synchronize these two different database systems?

An organization has deployed both Mule and non-Mule API implementations to integrate its customer and order management systems. All the APIs are available to REST clients on the public internet.
The organization wants to monitor these APIs by running health checks: for example, to determine if an API can properly accept and process requests. The organization does not have subscriptions to any external monitoring tools and also does not want to extend its IT footprint.
What Anypoint Platform feature provides the most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) way to monitor the availability of both the Mule and the non-Mule API implementations?

A company is implementing a new Mule application that supports a set of critical functions driven by a rest API enabled, claims payment rules engine hosted on oracle ERP. As designed the mule application requires many data transformation operations as it performs its batch processing logic.
The company wants to leverage and reuse as many of its existing java-based capabilities (classes, objects, data model etc.) as possible What approach should be considered when implementing required data mappings and transformations between Mule application and Oracle ERP in the new Mule application?

A company is building an application network and has deployed four Mule APIs: one experience API, one process API, and two system APIs. The logs from all the APIs are aggregated in an external log aggregation tool. The company wants to trace messages that are exchanged between multiple API implementations. What is the most idiomatic (based on its intended use) identifier that should be used to implement Mule event tracing across the multiple API implementations?

解説: (JPNTest メンバーにのみ表示されます)
The ABC company has an Anypoint Runtime Fabric on VMs/Bare Metal (RTF-VM) appliance installed on its own customer-hosted AWS infrastructure.
Mule applications are deployed to this RTF-VM appliance. As part of the company standards, the Mule application logs must be forwarded to an external log management tool (LMT).
Given the company's current setup and requirements, what is the most idiomatic (used for its intended purpose) way to send Mule application logs to the external LMT?

A company is implementing a new Mule application that supports a set of critical functions driven by a rest API enabled, claims payment rules engine hosted on oracle ERP. As designed the mule application requires many data transformation operations as it performs its batch processing logic.
The company wants to leverage and reuse as many of its existing java-based capabilities (classes, objects, data model etc.) as possible What approach should be considered when implementing required data mappings and transformations between Mule application and Oracle ERP in the new Mule application?

弊社を連絡する

我々は12時間以内ですべてのお問い合わせを答えます。

オンラインサポート時間:( UTC+9 ) 9:00-24:00
月曜日から土曜日まで

サポート:現在連絡