試験PMP-JPN トピック1 問題2009 スレッド
PMI PMP-JPNのリアル試験問題集
問題 #: 2009
トピック #: 1
問題 #: 2009
トピック #: 1
チームが通信システムの導入に取り組んでいるときに、クライアントがプロジェクトの終了を検討していると言いました。プロジェクト マネージャーは、プロジェクトが危険にさらされている理由を理解するために、クライアントとの緊急会議をスケジュールします。
プロジェクトマネージャーが、プロジェクトを継続するというクライアントの決定に影響を与えるために使用できるツールまたはテクニックを 2 つ選択しますか? (2つお選びください。)
プロジェクトマネージャーが、プロジェクトを継続するというクライアントの決定に影響を与えるために使用できるツールまたはテクニックを 2 つ選択しますか? (2つお選びください。)
おすすめの解答:A,C 解答を投票する
The project manager can use alternatives analysis and cost-benefit analysis to influence the client's decision to keep the project active. These are two tools or techniques that can help the project manager present different options and their implications to the client, and demonstrate the value and feasibility of the project.
Alternatives analysis is a technique that involves generating, comparing, and evaluating different possible courses of action in order to select the best one1. The project manager can use this technique to show the client the pros and cons of continuing or closing the project, and the impact of each option on the project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, quality, risk, and stakeholder satisfaction. The project manager can also propose alternative solutions or approaches that can address the client's concerns or issues, and explain how they can be implemented.
Cost-benefit analysis is a technique that involves comparing the expected costs and benefits of a project or an option to determine its economic viability and attractiveness2. The project manager can use this technique to show the client the return on investment (ROI) of the project, and how the benefits outweigh the costs. The project manager can also quantify the costs and benefits of different alternatives, and compare them to the baseline or the status quo. The project manager can also highlight the intangible or qualitative benefits of the project, such as customer satisfaction, reputation, social impact, or strategic alignment.
By using these two tools or techniques, the project manager can influence the client's decision to keep the project active by providing factual and rational information, appealing to the client's interests and values, and offering choices and flexibility.
References: 1: Alternatives Analysis - Project Management Knowledge 2: Cost Benefit Analysis - Project Management Knowledge
Alternatives analysis is a technique that involves generating, comparing, and evaluating different possible courses of action in order to select the best one1. The project manager can use this technique to show the client the pros and cons of continuing or closing the project, and the impact of each option on the project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, quality, risk, and stakeholder satisfaction. The project manager can also propose alternative solutions or approaches that can address the client's concerns or issues, and explain how they can be implemented.
Cost-benefit analysis is a technique that involves comparing the expected costs and benefits of a project or an option to determine its economic viability and attractiveness2. The project manager can use this technique to show the client the return on investment (ROI) of the project, and how the benefits outweigh the costs. The project manager can also quantify the costs and benefits of different alternatives, and compare them to the baseline or the status quo. The project manager can also highlight the intangible or qualitative benefits of the project, such as customer satisfaction, reputation, social impact, or strategic alignment.
By using these two tools or techniques, the project manager can influence the client's decision to keep the project active by providing factual and rational information, appealing to the client's interests and values, and offering choices and flexibility.
References: 1: Alternatives Analysis - Project Management Knowledge 2: Cost Benefit Analysis - Project Management Knowledge
青木** 2026-04-13 08:46:02
コメント
他人の解答コメントを賛成するのも、その解答に一票を入れることになります。したがって、すでに同じ意見の投票コメントが存在する場合、新規コメントをする代わりに賛成することもできます。
コメントを通報する
コメント中
今すぐ 新規登録 / ログイン (無料です)。