無料でゲット！最新の2026年最新の有効な練習American Planning Association AICP問題と解答でテストエンジン
AICP問題集PDFで100%合格保証付き
AICP 認定は、計画の専門家にとって高く評価され、その分野での卓越性の証明として認められています。認定プロセスには、AICP 試験に合格し、厳格な教育と経験要件を満たすことが含まれます。この試験は、計画の理論と実践の理解、およびこの知識を現実の計画問題に適用する能力をテストするように設計されています。その厳格な性質から、AICP 試験は、キャリアアップを目指す計画者にとって、挑戦的でありながら報酬のある経験として認識されています。
APA AICP認定試験は、複数選択の質問を含むコンピューターベースのテストです。試験は2つの部分に分類され、最初の部分は計画理論をカバーし、2番目の部分は計画の実践をカバーします。このテストはパス/失敗ベースで格付けされており、米国中のさまざまなテストセンターで与えられます。試験は厳格であり、テストテイカーは、成功するために試験の勉強と準備にかなりの時間を費やす準備をする必要があります。
質問 # 36
Each of the following may constitute a conflict of interest for a public planner under the AICP Code of Ethics EXCEPT:
- A. Accepting a gift from a local building firm.
- B. Processing a rezoning application for property the public planner owns.
- C. Applying for a Health Department permit to operate a stall at the Farmers' Market.
- D. Working for a developer who has an action before the Planning Board.
正解：C
質問 # 37
The following chart compares two options for appointing a planning director: Option Y (the planning director is appointed by the governor, overseeing the Office of State Planning and Various Other Departments); Option Z (the director is selected through the state's civil service process, with the governor overseeing the Department of State Planning and Various Other Departments separately). Given the information in the chart, which of the following can be concluded?
- A. In Option Y, the director could be dismissed for any reason.
- B. In Option Y, the governor would appoint a director who has supported them politically.
- C. In Option Y, the director would be a professional planner.
- D. The more competent professional planner would be named in Option Z rather than in Option Y.
正解：A
解説：
In Option Y, the governor directly appoints the planning director, implying a political appointment where the director serves at the governor's pleasure, meaning they can be dismissed at the governor's discretion (option C). In Option Z, the civil service process typically ensures merit-based selection with protections against arbitrary dismissal. The APA'sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under "Administration and Management," notes, "Political appointees, such as in a governor-appointed role, often serve at the pleasure of the appointer and can be dismissed for any reason." Option A (political support) is an assumption not supported by the chart. Option B (competence in Option Z) requires a judgment the chart doesn't provide.
Option D (professional planner) isn't guaranteed by the chart. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms,
"Governor-appointed directors can typically be dismissed at will," supporting option C.
References: APA AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), CPC Study Manual (2024), APA PAS Report on Planning Governance.
質問 # 38
Brownfield reuse assessments should consider:
I. Market receptiveness to remediated sites
II. Architectural standards
III. Surrounding uses
IV. Opportunities for funding and partnerships
- A. I, III, and IV
- B. I only
- C. I and II
- D. I, II, and III
正解：A
解説：
Brownfield reuse assessments evaluate the feasibility of redeveloping contaminated sites, focusing on practical and economic factors. I (market receptiveness) assesses demand for the sitepost-remediation. III (surrounding uses) ensures compatibility with nearby development. IV (funding and partnerships) identifies resources for cleanup and redevelopment. II (architectural standards) is not a primary concern, as it pertains to design, not feasibility. The APA'sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under "Areas of Practice," states, "Brownfield assessments should evaluate market demand, compatibility with surrounding uses, and funding opportunities." TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, "Key considerations for brownfield reuse include market receptiveness, surrounding uses, and funding/partnerships, but not architectural standards," supporting option D (I, III, and IV).
References: APA AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), CPC Study Manual (2024), APA PAS Report on Brownfield Redevelopment.
質問 # 39
What percentage of Americans lived in urbanized areas in the 2000 Census, the shortest since 1820?
- A. 50%
- B. 68%
- C. 78%
- D. 86%
正解：B
質問 # 40
Scenario: Public Decision-Making without Public Input
You are a new employee in the County Planning Department. Your assignment is to prepare the department's recommendations for the Capital Improvements Program (CIP). When you received the assignment, the Planning Director told you that all the city agencies submit their requests to the Planning Department where they are assembled. Your job is to review the requests for consistency with adopted plans and policies, and prepare a formal report listing the requests with recommendations. The report will then be sent from the Planning Department, to the Planning Commission, and finally to the County Supervisors for action. Although you have been given no explicit instructions regarding public comment you assume there will be public hearings before the Planning Commission.
You have been waiting for the list of projects for a couple of days now. While standing at the copy machine one morning, you overhear a conversation and suddenly become aware of an In-house informal review committee that "weeds our unnecessary requests. You are initially startled mostly because the Director never mentioned the procedure. On the other hand, you tell yourself, this committee must be doing a pretty good job.
After all, the other departments aren't squawking. And it certainly gives the Board of Supervisors a more manageable list of projects. You ask how this system evolved and you are told that the Supervisors needed a streamlined process and this scheme was devised.
In a sense, you feel as if the job has been taken away from you and from the Planning Commission. You do wonder about it because there is no public input to the process. Is there a problem?
Ethical Issues: Has an important public planning process been subverted to gain efficiency? Are appropriate people make public policy?
Action Alternatives:
1 There is no problem. You can't have a public hearing on everything or nothing would ever be accomplished.
You probably just didn't understand the assignment. You were expecting something to work like a textbook description rather than the real world
2. There may or may not be a problem Is the informal committee using reasonable planning standards or dividing the pie according to electoral districts? Find out if good planning rationale, consistent with adopted plans, is being followed.
3. There is a problem because the public and the Commission have been led to believe that the process allows them to comment on all the proposals, not a refined sub-list Write your report to advise the community that they are looking at an edited version of the original requests made by all the departments.
4. Decide that your director has a lack of confidence in you. Why else would you be given a meaningless task and not be told what you need to know? Consider resigning rather than serving as a "front" for a system in which you have no part
5. Other
Commentary: Public Decision-Making without Public Input
Code Citations;
A 3 A planner must strive to provide full, clear, and accurate information on planning issues to citizens and governmental decision-makers.
4 A planner must strive to give citizens the opportunity to have a meaningful impact on the development of plans and programs. Participation should be broad enough to include people who lack formal organization or influence.
5 A planner must strive to expand choice and opportunity for all persons, recognizing a special responsibility lo plan for the needs of disadvantaged groups and persons, and must urge the alteration of policies, institutions, and decisions which oppose such needs A planner owes diligent, creative, independent and competent performance of work in pursuit of the client's or employer's interest Such performance should be consistent with the planner's faithful service to the public interest
1 A planner must exercise independent professional judgment on behalf of clients and employers.
2 A planner must accept the decisions of a client or employer concerning the objectives and nature of the professional services to be performed unless the course of action to be pursued Involves conduct which is illegal or inconsistent with the planner's primary obligation to the public interest A planner should contribute to the development of the profession by improving knowledge and techniques, making work relevant to solutions of community problems, and increasing public understanding of planning activities. A planner should treat fairly the professional views of qualified colleagues and members of other professions.
The answer is given as an example. You need to write an essay based on the text given in the task.
正解：
解説：
Before consulting ethical guides, one must examine the relevant charter of enabling legislation to ensure that no specific or implied requirements for public review are being ignored. If such is the case, the planner should move immediately to inform others of the need to operate m compliance with the law. In this instance, we are assuming that the issue is not one of failing to meet the legal requirements. The public has the right to participate in public decision-making. The Code is quite explicit in urging that planners strive to provide full, clear and accurate information and to give citizens the opportunity to have meaningful impact on the development of plans and programs. However, the Code does not state at what point in the planning process that public participation should occur. In some communities, there is little participation in CIP planning as opposed to setting community goals You should first begin with alternative 2 and collect a little more information about the process. Investigate the situation to see if there has been a public participation process in the past. Perhaps you could sit in on a meeting of the review committee and find out if the decisions being made follow good planning practice and publicly adopted plans. If so, there may be no ethical problems.
If you are not permitted to join the committee or if people are not forthcoming in their responses, you should raise this issue with your supervisor and be prepared to act upon alternative 3. This course of action needs to be undertaken within the context of your responsibilities to fairly treat the views of colleagues. In this case, your newness may mean that you do not understand what is a well understood and completely accepted process. On the other hand, your fresh perspective may be just what is needed to remind the planners of a trap they may have fallen into as they substituted their role for that of the Commissioners m an effort to make the Commissioners' job a little more easy. There are many other ways that community participation can be solicited absent the presentation of a laundry list of capital projects. A "call for projects" could be issued to all the relevant citizen boards and commissions in your community. The Planning Commission meeting at which the CIP report is to be discussed should be advertised. You can suggest these and other alternatives to your director to help structure a more participatory process Reject Alternative 4. This is hardly the type of problem that merits resignation. Your newness may mean that you do not understand what is a completely accepted process within your new community. You also may have learned an important lesson in that not all the information you need to do your job will be handed to you. You need to be prepared to gather additional intelligence from your colleagues, files, and other records about how to oo your job. Keep in mind that the Code is not the place to seek information about how to "get the hang" of a new job You should be cautious about jumping to conclusions. A conversation with a more experienced planner can help you work through such circumstances. You could also talk with the Professional Development Officer of your local chapter.
質問 # 41
A planner is responsible for a comprehensive plan update with limited time and staff resources. The planner, as the team leader, must motivate the team members to do their task(s) and responsibilities. The best strategy to do this is to:
- A. Rely on outside resources such as guidelines, templates, and sample products.
- B. Craft a memorandum assigning detailed responsibilities.
- C. Keep an open-door policy for questions, track progress, and support if needed.
- D. Require staff to prepare daily progress reports.
正解：C
解説：
Motivating a team with limited resources requires supportive leadership that fosters collaboration and addresses challenges. Option C (keep an open-door policy, track progress, and support if needed) is the best strategy, as it encourages communication, monitors progress without micromanaging, and provides assistance, boosting morale and productivity. The APA'sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under
"Leadership," states, "Effective team motivation involves maintaining open communication, tracking progress, and providing support to address resource constraints." Option A (daily reports) is overly controlling and may demotivate staff. Option B (detailed memo) assigns tasks but doesn't motivate. Option D (outside resources) is a tool, not a motivation strategy. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, "Leaders motivate teams by keeping open communication, tracking progress, and offering support," supporting option C.
References: APA AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), CPC Study Manual (2024), APA PAS Report on Leadership in Planning.
質問 # 42
The process of working toward community consensus for neighborhood planning should begin with:
- A. Determining the purpose and objectives of the process.
- B. Developing options and alternatives for consideration.
- C. Preparing agendas for the upcoming community meetings.
- D. Creating a communication strategy for reaching community members.
正解：A
解説：
Building community consensus for neighborhood planning starts with a clear foundation. Option B (determining the purpose and objectives of the process) is the first step, as it sets the goals and scope, ensuring all subsequent steps align with community needs. The APA'sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), under "Communication and Interaction," states, "The consensus-building process begins by determining the purpose and objectives to guide community engagement." Option A (developing options) comes after defining objectives. Options C (preparing agendas) and D (communication strategy) are later steps once the purpose is clear. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, "The first step in community consensus for planning is to define the purpose and objectives of the process," supporting option B.
References: APA AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), CPC Study Manual (2024), APA PAS Report on Consensus Building.
質問 # 43
Among other things, subdivision regulations affect the:
- A. Type of activities that may occur on a particular site.
- B. Design of streets and the location of utilities.
- C. Use of building materials and manner of building construction.
- D. Height and bulk of structures.
正解：B
解説：
Subdivision regulations govern the division of land into lots for development, focusing on the layout and infrastructure of the subdivision. This includes the design of streets (e.g., width, alignment) and the location of utilities (e.g., water, sewer lines), as in option B. The APA'sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), under "Plan and Policy Development," states, "Subdivision regulations primarily address the design and layout of streets, lots, and utilities to ensure orderly development." Option A (building materials and construction) is typically regulated by building codes, not subdivision regulations. Option C (type of activities) pertains to zoning, which controls land use. Option D (height and bulk) is also a zoning matter, not subdivision regulation. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, "Subdivision regulations ensure proper street design and utility placement to support development," supporting option B.
References: APA AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), CPC Study Manual (2024), APA PAS Report on Subdivision Regulations.
質問 # 44
Which of the following is not part of the AICP Code of Ethics?
- A. Assist in the clarification of community goals, objectives and policies in plan-making.
- B. A planner must have special concern for the long range consequences of present actions.
- C. A planner must strive to expand choice and opportunity for all persons, recognizing a special responsibility to plan for the needs of disadvantaged groups and person, and must urge the alteration of policies, institutions and decisions which oppose such needs.
- D. A planner must strive to give citizens the opportunity to have a meaningful impact on the development of plans and programs. Participation should be broad enough to include people who lack formal organization or influence.
正解：C
質問 # 45
In 1973 the Energy Policy Conservation Act established CAFE standards for cars and trucks. What was the standard at that time for cars?
- A. 30.7 miles/gallon
- B. 37.5 miles/gallon
- C. 27.5 miles/gallon
- D. 20.7 miles/gallon
正解：C
質問 # 46
A community adopts a goal of "Health in all Policies" in its Comprehensive Plan. Which tool implements that goal?
- A. Creating buffer and separation requirements for transit stops
- B. Reducing residential densities
- C. Planning for parks within a ten-minute walk of all neighborhoods
- D. Restricting environmental review to major point sources of pollution
正解：C
解説：
"Health in all Policies" (HiAP) integrates health considerations into all policy decisions, aiming to improve community health outcomes. Option C (planning for parks within a ten-minute walk of all neighborhoods) directly implements this goal by promoting physical activity, mental well-being, and equitable access to green spaces, which are key health determinants. The APA'sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under
"Plan and Policy Development," states, "HiAP goals are implemented through tools like ensuring access to parks within a short walk, as this enhances community health." The APA'sPolicy Guide on Health in Planning (2016) emphasizes, "Proximity to parks supports HiAP by encouraging active lifestyles." Option A (reducing densities) may not directly improve health. Option B (transit stop buffers) is less directly tied to health outcomes. Option D (restricting environmental review) undermines health by limiting pollution oversight. The CPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, "Planning for accessible parks implements HiAP by fostering health through recreation," supporting option C.
References: APA AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), APA Policy Guide on Health in Planning (2016), CPC Study Manual (2024).
質問 # 47
The initial direct impact of the City Beautiful movement on the form of North American cities was that it:
- A. Encouraged residential subdivision design that was beautiful as well as functional.
- B. Promoted the construction of civic centers and other symbols of collective action.
- C. Introduced modern design concepts appropriate to cities built around automobile movement.
- D. Encouraged the construction of skyscrapers to create an exciting skyline.
正解：B
解説：
The City Beautiful movement, emerging from the 1893 Chicago World's Fair, aimed to improve urban aesthetics and civic pride through grand public spaces. Its initial impact was the promotion of civic centers, monuments, and public buildings as symbols of collective action, as seen in cities like Chicago and Washington, D.C. Option D (promoted the construction of civic centers) reflects this focus. The APA'sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under "Fundamental Planning Knowledge," states, "The City Beautiful movement's initial impact was the construction of civic centers and public spaces to enhance civic pride." Option A (subdivision design) came later with planned communities. Option B (automobile design) is unrelated, as the movement predates widespread car use. Option C (skyscrapers) was driven by economic factors, not the movement. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, "The City Beautiful movement initially led to civic centers and public symbols," supporting option D.
References: APA AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), CPC Study Manual (2024), APA PAS Report on City Beautiful Movement.
質問 # 48
Which component of zoning regulations would address equitable access to housing?
- A. Expanding areas zoned for single-family residential use
- B. Establishing both parking minimums and parking maximums
- C. Classifying assisted living facilities as a commercial use
- D. Establishing an administrative process for reasonable accommodation requests
正解：D
解説：
Equitable access to housing ensures that zoning regulations accommodate diverse populations, including those with disabilities or other needs. Option A (establishing an administrative process for reasonable accommodation requests) directly addresses this by allowing individuals to request modifications to zoning rules (e.g., for accessibility features) under the Fair Housing Act (FHA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The APA'sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under "Plan and Policy Development," notes that "zoning must include processes for reasonable accommodations to comply with federal laws like the FHA and ADA, ensuring equitable housing access." Option B (parking minimums and maximums) focuses on parking, not housing access. Option C (classifying assisted living as commercial) may limit housing options for seniors. Option D (expanding single-family zoning) often restricts housing diversity, reducing affordability and access. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, "Reasonable accommodation processes in zoning are critical for equitable housing access, particularly for people with disabilities," supporting option A.
References: APA AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), CPC Study Manual (2024), APA PAS Report on Zoning for Equity.
質問 # 49
Fiscal impact analysis is most directly concerned with:
- A. Service costs due to economic development.
- B. Municipal costs and revenues generated by development.
- C. Tax levies on residential and commercial properties.
- D. School costs due to increased population growth.
正解：B
解説：
Fiscal impact analysis evaluates the financial effects of a development on a municipality, focusing on the balance between costs (e.g., infrastructure, services) and revenues (e.g., taxes) generated. Option D (municipal costs and revenues generated by development) is the most direct concern. The APA'sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under "Plan Implementation," defines fiscal impact analysis as "an assessment of the costs and revenues a development will generate for a municipality." Option A (school costs) and B (service costs) are components but not the full scope. Option C (tax levies) is a revenue source, not the analysis itself. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) states, "Fiscal impact analysis focuses on the net impact ofdevelopment on municipal costs and revenues," supporting option D.
References: APA AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), CPC Study Manual (2024), APA PAS Report on Fiscal Impact Analysis.
質問 # 50
What percentage of households receive the long form of the US Census?
- A. 83%
- B. 50%
- C. 25%
- D. 17%
正解：D
質問 # 51
Which of these metropolitan regions have appointed or elected regional governance systems that bridge city- suburb boundaries and manage transit, parks and recreation, affordable housing, wastewater, or urban growth boundaries?
I. Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota
II. Orlando, Florida
III. Portland, Oregon
IV. Phoenix, Arizona
- A. II and IV
- B. I and III
- C. I and II
- D. III and IV
正解：B
解説：
Regional governance systems that bridge city-suburb boundaries manage shared resources like transit and housing. Minneapolis/St. Paul (I) has the Metropolitan Council, established in 1967, which oversees transit, wastewater, and housing across the Twin Cities region. Portland (III) has Metro, a directly elected regional government since 1979, managing urban growth boundaries, transit, and parks. The APA'sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under "Areas of Practice," identifies "Minneapolis/St. Paul's Metropolitan Council and Portland's Metro as leading examples of regional governance systems managing city-suburb issues." Orlando (II) and Phoenix (IV) lack similar comprehensive regional bodies-Orlando has some transit coordination, and Phoenix has the Maricopa Association of Governments, but neither has the broad authority of Metro or the Metropolitan Council. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, "Minneapolis/St. Paul and Portland have formal regional governance systems bridging city-suburb boundaries," supporting option B (I and III).
References: APA AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), CPC Study Manual (2024), APA PAS Report on Regional Governance.
質問 # 52
Which of the following are likely to be upheld legally as the public rationale for creating an office-housing linkage program?
I. To counteract market forces that make it difficult for office workers to find affordable housing near their workplace II. To control random growth of office development in suburban areas III. To provide a new source of revenue for local government IV. To provide a better solution to the problem of jobs and housing, while easing regional traffic problems
- A. I and IV only
- B. I, III, and IV only
- C. I and III only
- D. I, II, III, and IV
正解：A
解説：
Office-housing linkage programs require developers to provide or fund affordable housing as a condition of office development, aiming to balance jobs and housing. To be legally upheld, the rationale must demonstrate a legitimate public purpose and a nexus between the program and the stated goals, as established in cases like Nollan v. California Coastal Commission(1987) andDolan v. City of Tigard(1994). Option I (counteracting market forces for affordable housing) and option IV (balancing jobs and housing while easing traffic) directly address public welfare by linking office development to housing needs and reducing commute-related congestion, which courts have upheld as valid public purposes. Option II (controlling random office growth) is less directly tied to housing and may not justify the linkage requirement. Option III (new revenue source) is not a sufficient public purpose for imposing exactions, as it lacks a direct nexus to the housing issue. The APA'sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under "Plan and Policy Development," notes that linkage programs must "demonstrate a public purpose, such as addressing housing shortages for workers and reducing traffic impacts," supporting options I and IV. TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms that "linkage programs are upheld when they address housing-jobs imbalances and related issues like traffic," aligning with option A.
References: APA AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), CPC Study Manual (2024), APA PAS Report on Linkage Programs.
質問 # 53
When a public body acquires private property under eminent domain, which of the following must be true?
I. Condemnation procedures have begun.
II. A public purpose is involved.
III. The property acquired is adjacent to another parcel of public property.
- A. I only
- B. I and II only
- C. II only
- D. I, II, and III
正解：B
解説：
Eminent domain, under the Fifth Amendment, requires a public purpose and just compensation, and involves condemnation procedures to legally acquire property. Option I (condemnation procedures) is true, as it's the legal process for eminent domain. Option II (public purpose) is true, as per the Fifth Amendment. Option III (adjacent to public property) is not a requirement-eminent domain can apply to any property for a public purpose. The APA'sAICP Certification Exam Content Outline(2022), under "Fundamental Planning Knowledge," states, "Eminent domain requires a public purpose and follows condemnation procedures, but adjacency to public property is not mandated." TheCPC Study Manual(2024) confirms, "Eminent domain must involve a public purpose and condemnation, but proximity to public property is not required," supporting option C (I and II only).
References: APA AICP Certification Exam Content Outline (2022), CPC Study Manual (2024), APA PAS Report on Eminent Domain.
質問 # 54
Scenario
A site application is complete and is about to go before the planning commission. You have a conflict of interest because you personally own property near the proposed site and stand to benefit from the increase in property value that the new development is projected to generate. If you are the only planner in the community what might you do?
正解：
解説：
See the solution below
Explanation
You are definitely conflicted in this case. So first issue is to recognize this financial conflict of interest and disclose it. (Rule of Conduct 6) You have 2 options. One option is to get approval of your supervisor with full written disclosure as to your personal interest. You may get consent in writing to move forward and complete the review.
The second option is to hire an independent consultant to review the situation. It is good policy for a planning department to pre-qualify consultants for such situations so that the matter can be expeditiously turned over.
This may also be a good route to take if the applicant is a member of the city council and has hiring authority over the planner.
質問 # 55
......
AICPブレーン問題集リアル試験最新問題2026年04月21日には172問題：https://www.jpntest.com/shiken/AICP-mondaishu
最新AICP問題集リアル無料テストPDF本日更新です：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1Yh6oJO60ahVUMajQzG3iPu2OIv-MVqNA