本番さながらの環境で練習したい方には、JPNTestのテストエンジンがおすすめです。AI-300試験の画面構成や制限時間を再現した模擬試験で、Microsoft Operationalizing Machine Learning and Generative AI Solutionsの188の問題に取り組めます。本番の緊張感に慣れておけば、当日も落ち着いて解答できるようになります。

Microsoft AI-300 試験概要:

Microsoft AI-300 試験シラバストピック:

Microsoft Operationalizing Machine Learning and Generative AI SolutionsのQ&A

Microsoft Operationalizing Machine Learning and Generative AI Solutions 認定 AI-300 試験問題：

問題 #1

A team is experimenting with traditional models for a classification workflow in Azure Machine Learning.
The team requires a consistent way to manage assets that are created during experimentation.
You need to ensure that artifacts can be reused and governed across projects.
Which asset should you register?

A. Environment
B. Pipeline
C. Model
D. Component

問題 #2

Note: This question is part of a series of questions that present the same scenario. Each question in the series contains a unique solution that might meet the stated goals. Some question sets might have more than one correct solution, while others might not have a correct solution.
After you answer a question in this section, you will NOT be able to return to it. As a result, these questions will not appear on the review screen.
An organization provisions Azure Machine Learning workspaces for development, test, and production environments.
Each environment must be deployed consistently and updated through source control. The deployment process must be automated, repeatable, and auditable.
You need to deploy Azure Machine Learning resources in a consistent and controlled manner.
Solution: Define Azure Machine Learning resources in a Bicep template and deploy them within a GitHub Action.
Does the solution meet the goal?

A. Yes
B. No

問題 #3

Hotspot Question
You use Azure Machine Learning to implement hyperparameter tuning with a Bandit early termination policy for an Azure ML Python SDK v2-based model training.
The policy uses a slack_factor set to 0.1, an evaluation interval set to 1, and an evaluation delay set to 5.
You need to evaluate the outcome of the early termination policy.
What should you evaluate? To answer, select the appropriate options in the answer area.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

問題 #4

Case Study 1 - Fabrikam Inc.
Background
Fabrikam Inc. is a mid-sized healthcare analytics company that provides population health dashboards and predictive insights to regional hospital systems across the United States.
Fabrikam Inc. customers rely on near real time analytics to monitor patient flow, staffing needs, and readmission risks. They use multiple traditional forecasting machine learning models for predictions.
Fabrikam Inc. has an established Microsoft Azure footprint. The company uses Jupyter Notebooks that run on a local server as the primary development environment. The data science team is experiencing scalability, asset management and code management issues with the current development platform. Fabrikam Inc. plans to migrate to a cloud-based development environment to mitigate the issues.
Additionally, the company plans to implement a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based chat application for client support. Leadership requires the application to be developed and deployed with a low operational risk.
Current Environment
Fabrikam Inc. operates a single Azure subscription that has the following components:
* Azure Data Lake Storage Gen2 that contains de-identified clinical and operational datasets
* Azure AI Search indexing curated analytical documents and reference materials
* A small set of Python-based training scripts maintained by data scientists
* Azure OpenAI Service with deployed foundational models
* A Microsoft Foundry resource for building a RAG-based solution
Evaluation data has manually defined expected responses.
The current challenges faced by the data science team include the following:
* Model training jobs are run manually from notebooks.
* Experiment tracking is inconsistent
* Model versions are registered without standardized metadata.
* Deployment is performed manually by data scientists, with limited rollback capability.
* The team has no standardized evaluation process for generative AI outputs.
The environment currently allows public network access. Authentication relies on user accounts rather than managed identities. Compute targets are manually created and shared across experiments. This has led to resource contention during peak usage.
Business Requirements
Fabrikam Inc. has the following business requirements for the modernization initiative:
* Provide a conversational interface that answers analytics questions by using internal documents and datasets.
* Ensure that sensitive healthcare-related data is not exposed outside the Fabrikam Inc. Azure tenant.
* Enable repeatable and auditable model training and deployment processes.
* Support experimentation to compare prompt strategies and fine-tuned models.
* Align the model with the ranked preferences and optimize behavior for the long term.
* Minimize disruption to existing analytics workloads during rollout.
Technical Requirements
To support the business goals, Fabrikam Inc. identifies these technical requirements:
* Use Azure Machine Learning workspaces to centrally manage data assets, models, and environments.
* Implement experiment tracking and model versioning for all training jobs.
* Orchestrate training and evaluation by using pipelines rather than manually running notebooks.
* Deploy traditional machine learning models with support for staged rollout and rollback.
* Improve RAG-based solution output quality.
* Use the existing evaluation datasets that are based on real data with input-output pairs.
* Apply advanced fine-tuning techniques only when prompt engineering is insufficient Issues and Constraints Fabrikam Inc. must comply with internal security policies that require the company to restrict network access and avoid long-lived secrets. The data science team has limited Azure DevOps experience, so solutions must favor managed services and automation over custom infrastructure.
Cost predictability is important. Leadership prefers serverless or managed compute options where possible but is willing to approve dedicated compute for stable production workloads.
Problem Statement
Fabrikam Inc. must design and implement an Azure-based AI operations solution that enables reliable training, evaluation, deployment, and iteration of generative AI models. The solution must support experimentation and gradual rollout while ensuring governance, security, and operational stability. The data science and platform teams must collaborate to deliver this solution by using Azure Machine Learning and Microsoft Foundry capabilities.
You need to refine a GPT-5 model so that its performance and behavior align with the technical and business requirements of Fabrikam Inc.
Which two Foundry strategies should you apply? Each correct answer presents a complete solution. Choose two.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

A. Supervised fine-tuning
B. Synthetic data generation
C. Guardrails
D. Evaluations

問題 #5

Drag and Drop Question
An organization is deploying generative AI solutions by using Microsoft Foundry to support multiple production workloads.
The organization has the following workload requirements:
- One workload must be real-time, latency-sensitive, and have
predictable global usage patterns that demand consistent performance.
- One workload must have variable performance and be optimized for
cost-efficient operation.
You need to select a global deployment type for each workload.
Which type of deployment should you use for each workload requirement? To answer, move the appropriate deployment types to the correct requirements. You may use each deployment type once, more than once, or not at all. You may need to move the split bar between panes or scroll to view content.
NOTE: Each correct selection is worth one point.

解説：